<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to do Blogging with Word 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nirmaltv.com/2009/07/17/how-to-do-blogging-with-word-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2009/07/17/how-to-do-blogging-with-word-2010/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nirmal</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2009/07/17/how-to-do-blogging-with-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-183276</link>
		<dc:creator>Nirmal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=7626#comment-183276</guid>
		<description>@Alex,
The main feature of Word 2010 as blogging tool is the formatting options which is not available in WLW. But WLW also has additional features like tags, so it based on your usage that you can decide which is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alex,<br />
The main feature of Word 2010 as blogging tool is the formatting options which is not available in WLW. But WLW also has additional features like tags, so it based on your usage that you can decide which is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2009/07/17/how-to-do-blogging-with-word-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-183200</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=7626#comment-183200</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts on how this stacks up compared to Live Writer after giving it a try?  I&#039;ve been very pleased with Live Writer (though it hasn&#039;t inspired me to finish any blog posts lately!)  I&#039;m eagerly awaiting the 2010 experience!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on how this stacks up compared to Live Writer after giving it a try?  I&#8217;ve been very pleased with Live Writer (though it hasn&#8217;t inspired me to finish any blog posts lately!)  I&#8217;m eagerly awaiting the 2010 experience!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
