<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copy/Delete Files Faster in Windows with FastCopy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/10/08/copydelete-files-faster-in-windows-with-fastcopy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/10/08/copydelete-files-faster-in-windows-with-fastcopy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:04:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: amit</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/10/08/copydelete-files-faster-in-windows-with-fastcopy/comment-page-1/#comment-203129</link>
		<dc:creator>amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=4117#comment-203129</guid>
		<description>i want to download this software</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to download this software</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatIsHaHa</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/10/08/copydelete-files-faster-in-windows-with-fastcopy/comment-page-1/#comment-195259</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatIsHaHa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=4117#comment-195259</guid>
		<description>ExtremeCopy also very fast , it only takes me 77 seconds when I copy 4.2 G file between two hard drive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ExtremeCopy also very fast , it only takes me 77 seconds when I copy 4.2 G file between two hard drive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swfan1963</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/10/08/copydelete-files-faster-in-windows-with-fastcopy/comment-page-1/#comment-144653</link>
		<dc:creator>swfan1963</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=4117#comment-144653</guid>
		<description>Worked great for me - delleted 18,000 files in less than two minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worked great for me &#8211; delleted 18,000 files in less than two minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McColley.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Transfer Files Lightning Fast With FastCopy [Featured Windows Download]</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/10/08/copydelete-files-faster-in-windows-with-fastcopy/comment-page-1/#comment-103214</link>
		<dc:creator>McColley.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Transfer Files Lightning Fast With FastCopy [Featured Windows Download]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=4117#comment-103214</guid>
		<description>[...] In my informal testing FastCopy beat TeraCopy by a small to large margin depending on the type of file copy operation. When copying large batches of small files like 2-3MB JPEGs, FastCopy beat Teracopy by a nearly 800% margin. Performance decreased when copying larger files like DVD ISOs, but FastCopy still edged out TeraCopy by around 100%. Both programs can be used as portable USB apps, both have Windows shell integration with right click and drag and drop extensions, and both have a file transfer verification. TeraCopy has the ability to pause transfers, a feature absent from FastCopy. As mentioned above the interface of FastCopy is very cluttered and dull, so if looks matter, the vote definitely goes to TeraCopy for a much cleaner GUI. FastCopy is a free download for Windows only.  FastCopy [via Life Rocks 2.0] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In my informal testing FastCopy beat TeraCopy by a small to large margin depending on the type of file copy operation. When copying large batches of small files like 2-3MB JPEGs, FastCopy beat Teracopy by a nearly 800% margin. Performance decreased when copying larger files like DVD ISOs, but FastCopy still edged out TeraCopy by around 100%. Both programs can be used as portable USB apps, both have Windows shell integration with right click and drag and drop extensions, and both have a file transfer verification. TeraCopy has the ability to pause transfers, a feature absent from FastCopy. As mentioned above the interface of FastCopy is very cluttered and dull, so if looks matter, the vote definitely goes to TeraCopy for a much cleaner GUI. FastCopy is a free download for Windows only.  FastCopy [via Life Rocks 2.0] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copy/Delete Files fast in Windows &#124; Enquiring Mimes</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/10/08/copydelete-files-faster-in-windows-with-fastcopy/comment-page-1/#comment-102966</link>
		<dc:creator>Copy/Delete Files fast in Windows &#124; Enquiring Mimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=4117#comment-102966</guid>
		<description>[...] Download FastCopy [via LifeRocks 2.0] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Download FastCopy [via LifeRocks 2.0] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transfer Files Lightning Fast With FastCopy [Featured Windows Download] &#124; Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/10/08/copydelete-files-faster-in-windows-with-fastcopy/comment-page-1/#comment-102653</link>
		<dc:creator>Transfer Files Lightning Fast With FastCopy [Featured Windows Download] &#124; Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=4117#comment-102653</guid>
		<description>[...] In my informal testing FastCopy beat TeraCopy by a small to large margin depending on the type of file copy operation. When copying large batches of small files like 2-3MB JPEGs, FastCopy beat Teracopy by a nearly 800% margin. Performance decreased when copying larger files like DVD ISOs, but FastCopy still edged out TeraCopy by around 100%. Both programs can be used as portable USB apps, both have Windows shell integration with right click and drag and drop extensions, and both have a file transfer verification. TeraCopy has the ability to pause transfers, a feature absent from FastCopy. As mentioned above the interface of FastCopy is very cluttered and dull, so if looks matter, the vote definitely goes to TeraCopy for a much cleaner GUI. FastCopy is a free download for Windows only.  FastCopy [via Life Rocks 2.0] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In my informal testing FastCopy beat TeraCopy by a small to large margin depending on the type of file copy operation. When copying large batches of small files like 2-3MB JPEGs, FastCopy beat Teracopy by a nearly 800% margin. Performance decreased when copying larger files like DVD ISOs, but FastCopy still edged out TeraCopy by around 100%. Both programs can be used as portable USB apps, both have Windows shell integration with right click and drag and drop extensions, and both have a file transfer verification. TeraCopy has the ability to pause transfers, a feature absent from FastCopy. As mentioned above the interface of FastCopy is very cluttered and dull, so if looks matter, the vote definitely goes to TeraCopy for a much cleaner GUI. FastCopy is a free download for Windows only.  FastCopy [via Life Rocks 2.0] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NasirJumani</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/10/08/copydelete-files-faster-in-windows-with-fastcopy/comment-page-1/#comment-102503</link>
		<dc:creator>NasirJumani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=4117#comment-102503</guid>
		<description>I have tried both, this and teracopy....but I found it a bit faster than teracopy...thanks for letting us know about this wonderful app :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried both, this and teracopy&#8230;.but I found it a bit faster than teracopy&#8230;thanks for letting us know about this wonderful app <img src='http://www.nirmaltv.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transfer Files Lightning Fast With FastCopy [Featured Windows Download] &#124; The tech blog</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/10/08/copydelete-files-faster-in-windows-with-fastcopy/comment-page-1/#comment-102491</link>
		<dc:creator>Transfer Files Lightning Fast With FastCopy [Featured Windows Download] &#124; The tech blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=4117#comment-102491</guid>
		<description>[...] In my informal testing FastCopy beat TeraCopy by a small to large margin depending on the type of file copy operation. When copying large batches of small files like 2-3MB JPEGs, FastCopy beat Teracopy by a nearly 800% margin. Performance decreased when copying larger files like DVD ISOs, but FastCopy still edged out TeraCopy by around 100%. Both programs can be used as portable USB apps, both have Windows shell integration with right click and drag and drop extensions, and both have a file transfer verification. TeraCopy has the ability to pause transfers, a feature absent from FastCopy. As mentioned above the interface of FastCopy is very cluttered and dull, so if looks matter, the vote definitely goes to TeraCopy for a much cleaner GUI. FastCopy is a free download for Windows only.  FastCopy [via Life Rocks 2.0] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In my informal testing FastCopy beat TeraCopy by a small to large margin depending on the type of file copy operation. When copying large batches of small files like 2-3MB JPEGs, FastCopy beat Teracopy by a nearly 800% margin. Performance decreased when copying larger files like DVD ISOs, but FastCopy still edged out TeraCopy by around 100%. Both programs can be used as portable USB apps, both have Windows shell integration with right click and drag and drop extensions, and both have a file transfer verification. TeraCopy has the ability to pause transfers, a feature absent from FastCopy. As mentioned above the interface of FastCopy is very cluttered and dull, so if looks matter, the vote definitely goes to TeraCopy for a much cleaner GUI. FastCopy is a free download for Windows only.  FastCopy [via Life Rocks 2.0] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nirmal</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/10/08/copydelete-files-faster-in-windows-with-fastcopy/comment-page-1/#comment-102249</link>
		<dc:creator>Nirmal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=4117#comment-102249</guid>
		<description>@Madhur,
Cant say whether this is better than Tera Copy or not. This works good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Madhur,<br />
Cant say whether this is better than Tera Copy or not. This works good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madhur Kapoor</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/10/08/copydelete-files-faster-in-windows-with-fastcopy/comment-page-1/#comment-102244</link>
		<dc:creator>Madhur Kapoor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=4117#comment-102244</guid>
		<description>Is it better than TeraCopy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it better than TeraCopy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
