<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Releases Reader 9 with Flash Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/07/02/adobe-releases-reader-9-with-flash-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/07/02/adobe-releases-reader-9-with-flash-support/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:41:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hendry Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.nirmaltv.com/2008/07/02/adobe-releases-reader-9-with-flash-support/comment-page-1/#comment-86372</link>
		<dc:creator>Hendry Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirmaltv.com/?p=2893#comment-86372</guid>
		<description>Nirmal,

How does it compare in speed to previous version? I hate it when Adobe Reader has to load so slowly. I installed a version without sound support (still using v7).

I&#039;ve tested Foxit PDF Reader in the past. Impressive speed, but still prefer the &quot;real&quot; thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nirmal,</p>
<p>How does it compare in speed to previous version? I hate it when Adobe Reader has to load so slowly. I installed a version without sound support (still using v7).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tested Foxit PDF Reader in the past. Impressive speed, but still prefer the &#8220;real&#8221; thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
