优选Firefox为宽频

评论

• Yunus Yesilmen 说：
  

  感谢Nirmal，现在appling…

  张贴 2008年3月7日在12:42上午
• Hammad 说：
  

  感谢nirmal真正地精密岗位
  现在尝试它的im和将告诉您结果
  并且btw i m一个新的读者和我必须认为它一优秀blog
  gj ..... 订阅

  张贴 2008年3月7日在1:50上午
• Joel 说：
  

  可能firefox应该请求这些设置，当我们安装…然后它会是好…大多好特点现在保持您指出它…的暗藏的…好时

  张贴 2008年3月7日在2:43上午
• Nirmal (作者) 说：
  

  @Joel，
  纠正，许多特点在Firefox掩藏，共同的用户不可以知道这些。

  张贴 2008年3月7日在8:10上午
• Nirmal (作者) 说：
  

  @Hammad，
  感谢您喜欢我的blog的参观，高兴。

  Posted on March 7th, 2008 at 10:27 am
• Rakshit said:
  

  Long before I tried this technique to improve the browsing speed of Firefox. I read that somewhere. But I couldn’t notice any significant change in it. I am still not sure whether this actually works or not. Please correct me if I am wrong.

  Posted on March 7th, 2008 at 3:07 pm
• Nirmal (Author) said:
  

  @Rakshit,
  Well I’m not sure whether this will bring about a huge change, may be a small one.

  Posted on March 7th, 2008 at 3:11 pm
• Ashish Mohta said:
  

  @Rakshit: If you already have a good speed you might not notice. This can be useful for people like having a speed of less than 256 or who are on USB Wifi.

  @Nirmal: What does the last option ment for ?

  Posted on March 7th, 2008 at 7:50 pm
• Nirmal (Author) said:
  

  @Rakshit,
  I have noted an increase in the speed of Firefox while loading the websites.

  @Ashish,
  The last option says how much time Firefox has to wait before rendering or loading the websites, generally its not set in config and so defaults to 250, setting it to 0 will start the rendering process immediately.

  Posted on March 7th, 2008 at 9:15 pm
• Rakshit said:
  

  @Ashish
  Yea, you may be right.I’ll try this out on my home internet connection which happens to be only 64kbps.
  

  @Nirmal
  It’s nice to hear that.
  

  Posted on March 7th, 2008 at 11:02 pm
• Kannan said:
  

  I didnt find any difference. I may not be noticing.

  Posted on March 9th, 2008 at 1:13 pm
• Alfred said:
  

  Hey Nirmal,
  thats a nice tip, ive done it, will test if it makes any difference.
  im back after a 1 month break and ur was the first site i started checking, lots of me things to read, keep it up

  Posted on March 11th, 2008 at 10:27 pm
• Ashok said:
  

  Hi Nirmal,
  Thanks for your tips..it seems to be a good tweak for firefox. If you have ny new tweaks to increase Broadband speed, please share with us.. Thanks man,Keep up the good work

  Posted on March 22nd, 2008 at 6:50 pm
• Don said:
  

  Nirmal,
  Thanks for the tip. It was recommended to my local Mac club, and more than one of our users reports better Firefox performance.

  I read your tip “How To Back-Up Firefox Settings.” For Mac users, do you know what file is equivalent to the Windows Firefox settings file “prefs.js?” I don’t find a file with that name on my Mac (using Firefox v2.0.0.14).

  Thanks a lot!

  Posted on June 2nd, 2008 at 3:58 am
• Gary Kampel said:
  

  First, I am not a computer code writer. Just a guy that read your suggestion and passed it on to others in my Macintosh User Group

  I was reading the article at http://kb.mozillazine.org/Ngla.....aint.delay and was wondering why not set the value at “1″ rather than “0″? Would the one millisecond give the program a breif moment to “catch its breath?”

  Also, Mozilla suggests changing content.notify.interval too. http://kb.mozillazine.org/Content.notify.interval
  What are your thoughts on this? What, if anything, would you set this for and why?

  Posted on June 7th, 2008 at 6:06 pm
• Seth Woodworth said:
  

  The network.http.pipelining.maxrequests only accepts values from 1 to 8 inclusive according to the Firefox wiki:

  http://kb.mozillazine.org/Netw.....axrequests

  Where did you get 15 from? Was this a value from FF2.0?

  Posted on July 13th, 2008 at 5:22 pm

Trackbacks

There are no trackbacks