Browser Memory Test: Firefox vs IE7 vs Safari vs Flock vs Opera瀏覽器記憶測驗：火狐與Safari瀏覽器IE7的比對羊群與歌劇
ADVERTISEMENTS 廣告Last time when I wrote a post on去年的時候，我寫了一哨所 how to save IE from attacks如何保存IE瀏覽器免受攻擊 , all my readers were of the opinion that Firefox should be used instead of using IE7. ，我所有的讀者都認為火狐應當使用而不使用IE7的。 We all know the fact that Firefox consumes lot of memory while running.我們都知道一個事實，即Firefox的消耗大量的內存，而運行。 With 5-6 tabs open, Firefox was consuming lot of memory for me, so I decided to check which browser was best in terms of memory consumption.隨著5-6標籤開放， Firefox的是消費大量的記憶對我來說，所以我決定檢查哪一個瀏覽器是最好的記憶體方面的消費。
Browsers tested:瀏覽器測試：
- Firefox火狐
- IE 7 IE 7瀏覽器
- Flock羊群
- Opera歌劇
- Safari野生動物園
In order to test the browsers, I opened only 2 websites, one was this blog and other was為了測試的瀏覽器，我打開只有2網站，一個是本博客和其他被 Google search page谷歌搜索頁面 . 。 Here are the results;以下是結果;
1. 1 。 Firefox 火狐
Memory used: 59 MB內存使用： 59甲基溴
2. 2 。 Flock 羊群
Memory used: 58 MB內存使用： 58甲基溴
3. 3 。 Opera 歌劇
Memory used: 35 MB內存使用： 35甲基溴
4. 4 。 IE7 7
Memory used: 49 MB內存使用： 49甲基溴
5. 5 。 Safari 野生動物園
Memory used: 53 MB內存使用： 53甲基溴
Firefox was the one which consumed maximum memory and Opera the least.火狐是其中最大的內存消耗和Opera最少。 Opera is definitely the best in terms of memory consumption, but the fact that it does not have much options in terms of add-ons like Firefox or Flock makes it less popular compared to Firefox.戲曲無疑是最好的記憶體方面的消費，但事實上，它沒有太多的選擇方面的插件如Firefox或羊群使它受歡迎程度相比， Firefox的。 Flock is also a good option considering the fact that its build on Firefox platform and also supports most of the Firefox add-ons.羊群也是一個不錯的選擇考慮到其基礎上的Firefox平台，並支持大多數的Firefox插件。 The latest version of Safari is much stable and consumes less memory.最新版本的Safari是很多穩定和消耗較少的內存。
Share & Enjoy分享與享受
Dec 6th, 2007 at 12:16 am 07年12月6號在上午12點16分
Firefox definitely uses up a lot of memory but the reason could be some of the extensions too. Firefox的絕對使用了大量的存儲空間，但原因可能是一些擴展了。 I use firefox with a profile which has no extensions installed and it works perfect consuming less memory.我使用的Firefox的配置文件，沒有擴展安裝和完善工作內存消耗少。
I have not use Opera though but use both IE7 and Firefox and feel IE7 performs quite good when it comes to memory usage.我還沒有使用，但歌劇雖然同時使用IE7和其競爭對手Firefox和IE7的表現感到相當好的時候對內存的使用。
The best thing to do for consuming less memory is regulalry clearing the cache in Firefox.生命中最好的事情少的消費記憶是regulalry清除Firefox中的快取。
BTW I was curious whether you conducted these tests using the same tabs open in all the browsers?生物及毒素武器我很好奇你是否進行了這些試驗使用相同的標籤中打開的所有瀏覽器？
Dec 6th, 2007 at 2:07 am 07年12月6號在上午2點07
Firefox is definitely a hog.火狐肯定是一個養豬。 What’s worse is that just a couple versions back, it had a lot of memory issues.更糟糕的是，一對夫婦剛剛回來的版本，它有很多的內存問題。 Sometimes, I would notice it using 500MB+ of memory if I’ve had it open for a long time and had visited a lot of sites (which is the norm for me).有時候，我會通知它使用500 +的內存，如果我已經打開了很長一段時間，並訪問了大量的網站（這是我的規範） 。
Dec 6th, 2007 at 10:01 am 07年12月6號在上午10點01
@Keith, @基思，
The memory of Firefox could be with those extension also, but I have least number of extensions.記憶的Firefox可以與那些還延長，但我至少有一些擴展。 Even IE also has the same number of extensions.即使IE瀏覽器也有相同數量的擴展。
All the browsers were tested for same number of tabs and same websites and no other window was open.所有的瀏覽器進行了測試的相同數量的標籤和相同的網站，並沒有其他的窗戶被打開。 All under same conditions.所有相同的條件下。
@JoeTech, @ JoeTech ，
Lets hope that the new version will be much better in terms of memory.讓我們希望，新版本將在好多方面的記憶。
Dec 6th, 2007 at 10:04 am 07年12月6號在上午10點04分
How long was the tabs kept open?多久標籤是保持開放？ When you open Firefox for a longer period of time, the memory goes up exponentially.當你打開Firefox一段較長的時間內，記憶隨之呈指數。 It takes 120+ MB if opened for a day or so.它120 + MB如果開放一天左右。
Opera might not have Add ons as Firefox but has a lot of features that FX doesn’t has.歌劇可能沒有附加功能如Firefox ，但有很多功能，效果沒有了。 We need extension for them.我們需要為他們延長。
Safari also has a lot of features than Firefox and the good thing is it’s supporting add ons! Safari瀏覽器也有許多的功能比Firefox和良好的一點是它添加插件支持！ Popular Add Ons in Firefox like ABP, Greasemonkey is already there in Safari now.通俗附加在Firefox中一樣抗菌肽的Greasemonkey已經在Safari中有現在。
I use FX, only for the extensions and it’s days is numbered if they don’t fix the memory issue.我使用效果，不僅對擴展和它的天數如果他們不解決內存問題。 I’ve 3 GB RAM at my disposal yet I like to use Safari if more features and add ons are there.我已經3 GB的內存在我的處置還沒有我喜歡使用Safari如果有更多的功能和附加功能在那裡。 Also Safari for Mac has more features and better than Safari for Windows.另外Safari瀏覽器的Mac擁有更多功能和更好的比野生的Windows 。
Dec 6th, 2007 at 10:22 am 07年12月6號在上午10時22分
@Ashwin, @ Ashwin ，
You got a valid point there, regarding the time it was open.你有一個有效的點有關於當時開放。 All the browsers were open only for a few minutes until the memory consumption was stable.所有的瀏覽器是開放只有幾分鐘，直到內存消耗穩定。 FX does increase its memory consumption when you keep for more than a day.外匯並不增加其內存消耗當你保持一天以上。
Dec 6th, 2007 at 5:14 pm 07年12月6號在下午五點14分
Firefox uses a lot of memory instead of 2 websites if you open many tabs and for longer period you will have different results i guess.火狐使用了大量的存儲空間而不是2的網站如果打開許多標籤和更長的時間你將有不同的結果我猜。 If we dont use many extensions in Firefox it wont consume a lot of memory如果我們不使用許多Firefox中的擴展它慣於消耗了大量的存儲空間
Dec 6th, 2007 at 5:25 pm 07年12月6號在下午5時25分
Good comparison there.有良好的比較。 I’ve also found that FF consumes a lot of memory, but I’m still hesitant to switch because if I do, I’m going to miss the extensions.我還發現，法國法郎消耗了大量的存儲空間，但我仍然猶豫不決，開關，因為如果我這樣做，我會想念的擴展。
On my PC, IE 7 is a big memory hog.在我的電腦， IE 7瀏覽器是一個很大的記憶體豬。 It hangs even when one or two tabs are open and performs slowly.它甚至掛起時，一個或兩個標籤是公開和執行進展緩慢。
Dec 6th, 2007 at 6:06 pm 07年12月6號在下午6時06分
@Ram, @公羊，
You are right, if you keep Firefox open with too many tabs for long time, it virtually hangs Windows.你說得對，如果你保持開放的Firefox擁有太多標籤的很長一段時間，它幾乎掛起的Windows 。
@Shankar, @香，
Its very difficult to switch from Firefox.它很難從Firefox的開關。
Dec 6th, 2007 at 8:25 pm 07年12月6號在下午8時25分
@nirmal, @ nirmal ，
It’s looking better so far.這是尋找更好迄今。 The Zend developer platform seems to be hogging memory, though.在Zend的開發平台，似乎是佔用內存，但。 Oddly, it says it’s using 50MB, but when I closed it yesterday, I got about 400MB back, which could be a fluke.奇怪的是，它表示，它使用50MB的，但是當我關閉它昨天，我約400MB回來，這可能是僥倖。
Dec 6th, 2007 at 10:55 pm 07年12月6號在下午10點55
When it comes to memory, Firefox is the hungriest of all當涉及到內存， Firefox是在飢餓的所有
But still, once addicted, you can’t get off it但是，一旦上癮，你不能下車，這 
Dec 7th, 2007 at 2:43 am 2007年12月七日在上午02點43
I prefer IE and sometims Opera.我喜歡IE和sometims歌劇院。 Opera is very lightwait , as can be seen from your experiments.歌劇是非常lightwait可以看出，從您的實驗。
Dec 7th, 2007 at 7:14 am 2007年12月七日在上午07點14分
A few quick questions:有幾個快速的問題：
1. 1 。 What extensions or add-ons were in use with the browsers?什麼擴展或插件在使用的瀏覽器？
2. 2 。 Were any plug-ins being displayed?有任何插件，正在顯示？ (ie Flash) （即閃光）
3. 3 。 What OS was this under?什麼是這個操作系統下？ (I’m assuming Windows XP or Windows 2000) （我假設Windows XP或Windows 2000 ）
4. 4 。 What were the system specifications?有哪些系統規格？
5. 5 。 How long had the programs been running?多久了程序運行？
6. 6 。 Was there any sort of swap (or at least that is the Linux term) in use?是否有任何形式的互換（或至少是長期的Linux ）在使用？
8. 8 。 What versions of Firefox, Flock, and Opera were you using?什麼版本的Firefox ，羊群，和Opera是您使用？ I am getting considerably less for a Firefox trunk build than Firefox 2.我越來越少了Firefox的主幹建設比Firefox 2 。 Firefox 1.5 is using even more (from GNU/Linux system). Firefox 1.5中使用更（從GNU / Linux系統） 。
I’m just asking because I don’t see how these results are conclusive.我只是問，因為我不知道這些結果是決定性的。 I am getting different results that you by testing on Linux (without IE7 and Safari of course), Windows Vista, and Windows XP.我收到不同的結果，你通過測試在Linux上（不包括7和Safari當然） ， Windows Vista中，和Windows XP 。 It may also be the specific versions that are different.這也可能是具體的版本，是不同的。
Also, what is the tool you are using to calculate memory usage?此外，什麼是工具，您使用的是計算內存的使用？ Different tools tend to have different results slightly, depending on how it is calculated.不同的工具往往有不同的結果略有下降，這取決於它是如何計算的。
Dec 7th, 2007 at 7:17 am 2007年12月七日在上午07點17
Oh, also, I would like to point out that on Vista Home Basic, IE7 hangs for me a lot.哦，也，我想指出，對Vista Home Basic的， 7掛起的我很多東西。 It literally crashes the system if I have more than 7 or 8 tags open because it consumed 98% of the memory.它字面的系統崩潰如果我有超過7或8標籤開放，因為它消耗的98 ％的記憶。
Dec 7th, 2007 at 10:09 am 2007年12月七日在上午十時09分
Recently I installed 5 browsers on my machine最近我安裝了第5的瀏覽器在我的機器
1) IE 7 1 ） IE 7瀏覽器
2) Firefox 2 ）火狐
3) Safari 3 ） Safari瀏覽器
4) Opera 4 ）歌劇
5) Netscape Navigator 5 ）的Netscape Navigator
I know you will ask me why this many, but just to test my website design on different browsers.我知道你會問我為什麼這麼多，但只是為了測試我的網站設計在不同的瀏覽器。
Meanwhile when I read this blog, I decided to test Navigator aswell, but it failed in your ranking.同時當我看到這個博客，我決定測試以及導航，但它未能在您的排名。 Comes around last 2, but the memory grows slowly as you keep it open for some time.周圍是去年2 ，但記憶體生長緩慢你保持開放了一段時間。 Meanwhile Opera took the first position as well.與此同時歌劇了第一的立場。 Opera was the most stable, optimized software. Opera是最穩定，最優化的軟件。 Which has a stable memory usage and doesnt grow with time.其中有一個穩定的內存使用和doesn't隨時間增長。
Dec 7th, 2007 at 10:18 am 2007年12月七日在上午10點18分
@Jake, @傑克，
To clarify your doubts;為了澄清你的疑問;
1. 1 。 Firefox had alexa plug and Stumble upon, IE also had 2 plugins installed, so was the case with Flock.火狐瀏覽器在全球排名插件和失敗後， IE瀏覽器也有2款插件安裝的，所以就是這樣的情況羊群。 Safari and Opera didnt have any plugins Safari和Opera didn't有任何插件
2. 2 。 Flash was not displayed閃光是沒有顯示
3. 3 。 Windows XP Windows XP中
4. 4 。 System specification?系統規範？ I dont think that should matter as all are running on same specs我不認為應該所有的問題上正在運行的同一規格
5. 5 。 All the browsers were tested for same time.所有的瀏覽器進行了測試的同時。 Firefox increases its memory consumption when kept for long time. Firefox的增加內存的消耗時保持很長一段時間。
6. 6 。 No sort of Swaps任何一種互換
7. 7 。 All browsers were of the latest version stable version available所有瀏覽器的最新版本穩定版本
IE7 gives sometimes too much memory hog for me also.有時讓IE7的太多記憶養豬對我來說還。 Jake remember this is not an exhaustive testing.傑克記住這不是一個詳盡的測試。
But we have to agree to the fact that Opera is the lightest of all, but lack of add-ons makes it weak.但是，我們必須同意這樣一個事實，即歌劇是最輕的一切，但缺乏插件使得薄弱。
Dec 7th, 2007 at 10:20 am 2007年12月七日在上午十點20分
@SmackAll, @ SmackAll ，
Initially I thought of installing Netscape as well, but then at the last minute, didnt add it.起初我還以為安裝的Netscape ，以及，但在最後一分鐘， didn't添加它。
Dec 7th, 2007 at 9:01 pm 2007年12月七日在下午9時01分
I got sick of FF 2, and switched to Opera with its breeze-like surfing.我生病法郎2 ，切換到歌劇的微風，像衝浪。 However, I got tired of having to adjust to a vanilla browser sans the plugins.但是，我已經厭倦了適應無香草的瀏覽器插件。 If it weren’t for extensions, I’d be happy on Opera.如果不是擴展，我很樂意的歌劇院。
Flock is good in that aspect, as there’s all the extensions.羊群是好的，這方面的問題，因為有所有的擴展。 And Duncan Riley of techcrunch said its much better in memory and CPU usage.和鄧肯的techcrunch萊利說，好多在內存和CPU使用情況。
I’m gonna try Flock as soon as it hits a stable version.我一定努力羊群盡快安打一個穩定的版本。
Dec 8th, 2007 at 9:25 pm 07年12月8日在下午9時25分
after couple of hour, My Firefox consume all my comp memory後幾個小時，我的Firefox的消耗我的所有的計算機內存
Dec 9th, 2007 at 4:17 pm 07年12月9日在下午4時17分
@Sumesh, @ Sumesh ，
Flock’s stable version is available.羊群的穩定的版本。
Dec 10th, 2007 at 7:57 am 2007年12月10日在上午07點57分
Nice take.尼斯考慮。
I love FireFox but it is a real memory hog even on my System with 1.5 GB of RAM.我喜歡火狐，但它是一個真正的記憶養豬即便是在我的系統有1.5 GB的RAM 。
Opera is also cool and I use it sometimes but, not as frequently as FireFox. Opera也冷靜，我要使用它，但有時，而不是經常因為Firefox 。
Cheers (y)乾杯（元Y ）
Dec 10th, 2007 at 11:47 am 07年十二月十日在上午11點47分
@Nirmal @ Nirmal
Anyway, I dont think Netscape is competing the others in any way.不管怎樣，我不認為是競爭的Netscape其他任何方式。 It lags in all tests but still bit stable then firefox.它落後於所有的測試，但仍有些然後Firefox的穩定。 Thats all about Netscape.多數民眾贊成在所有有關的Netscape 。
Apr 10th, 2008 at 11:08 am 2008年4月一十〇日在上午11時08
I suggest people look for enigma browser and download it from我建議人們查找謎瀏覽器和下載它從 http://store.democratz.org
You can find the link just above the products and you can download it for free.你可以找到連結略高於產品，你可以免費下載。
Engima runs faster than Firefox and you can easily run 32 tabs and not slow down the machine. Engima的運行速度比Firefox ，你可以很容易地運行32個標籤，而不是放慢機器。
Jun 24th, 2008 at 8:58 pm 2008年6月24日在下午8時58分
I have been using the firefox for more than 6 years with no problems, What are you guys talking about memory, is everybody using 64MB of RAM,Then please change your system confirguration.As i was writing this, i checked my IE memory it was like 123MB.我一直在使用Firefox超過6年，沒有什麼問題，什麼是你們談論的記憶，是每個人使用的64MB的RAM ，然後請更改您系統confirguration.As我寫這篇文章，我檢查我的IE瀏覽器記憶是像123MB 。
Memory usage largly depends on the websites which you use.ActiveX thats loaded and things like that.內存使用largly取決於你的網站use.ActiveX多數民眾贊成在加載等等。
If you want your system to get attacked by virus,Frequent crashes you can very well use the IE.In that sense its really good.如果您希望您的系統，以獲得攻擊，病毒，頻繁崩潰，您可以很好利用IE.In這個意義上講它非常不錯的成績。
Otherwise for a good browser experience and lots of add-On features Firefox is the best.否則有一個良好的瀏覽器的經驗和大量的附加功能的Firefox是最好的。
I would rank browser’s in this order firefox,opera,IE….我想排名的瀏覽器在此為了火狐，歌劇， IE瀏覽器... 。
I have used opera its just fast that you couldnot imagine.我用歌劇的正義之快，你couldnot想像的。
Support opensource guys….支持開源傢伙... 。
Aug 25th, 2008 at 5:25 am 2008年8月25號在上午05時25
Nirmal, Nirmal ，
You are right….你說得對... 。
Firefox takes lot of memory.火狐需要大量的內存。 I have also noticed that when you close all the opened tabs and keep open only one tab.我還注意到，當您關閉所有打開的標籤和保持開放只有一個標籤。 It still doesn’t release the memory.它仍然沒有釋放內存。
Do you know any trick to overcome this…你知道的任何把戲來克服這種...
Sep 13th, 2008 at 6:12 pm 9月13日， 2008年在下午6點12
Its true in my experience.其真正的在我的經驗。
Firefox takes very large memory an causing system to slow. Firefox的需要非常大的內存是造成系統緩慢。
But i am unable to leave using firefox due to the options like open last closed tab and in closing firefox inappropriate way,is gives option resume session.但我無法離開使用Firefox由於想辦法打開上次關閉標籤，並關閉Firefox的不適當的方式，是讓選擇恢復會議。
Trackbacks to this post搬場這一職務
Dec 7th, 2007 at 12:23 pm 2007年12月七日在下午12點23
Dec 9th, 2007 at 12:20 am 07年12月9日在上午12時20分
Dec 23rd, 2007 at 4:48 am 2007年12月23號在上午04時48分