Google Apps and Microsoft Office Live- Comparitive Study谷歌Apps和微軟Office Live ,比較研究

Advertisements廣告

In my last post I wrote about我在去年後我寫的 how to configure如何配置 and use和使用 Google Apps for your domain谷歌應用服務為您的域名 . Office Live is the direct competition to Google Apps from Microsoft. Office Live是直接的競爭谷歌應用服務從Microsoft 。 Both of them have free versions and premium versions targeted for different sections.他們都免費版本和高級版本,針對不同的章節。 Even though the two services are targeted towards similar audiences, there are some very specific differences.儘管這兩項服務是針對類似的聽眾,有一些非常具體的分歧。 Lets do a comparative study of the features.讓我們做了比較研究的功能。

間隔Google Apps間隔微軟Office Live

Microsoft Office Live Basics: Basics is the free version from Microsoft Office Live. 微軟Office Live基本:基本是免費版本從微軟的Office Live 。 The free version has the following features,免費版本有以下特點,

  • Microsoft Office Live Basics includes one FREE domain name for your business.微軟Office Live基本包括一個免費域名為您的企業。
  • Access your mails, calenders, tasks etc. Allows to create 25 free email accounts with your domain and each email having 2GB of space.訪問您的電子郵件, calenders ,任務等允許建立25個免費電子郵件帳戶,您的域名和每個電子郵件有2GB的空間。
  • Easy-to-use Web site design tools.簡單易用的網站設計工具。
  • 500 MB of Web site storage space. 500 MB的Web站點存儲空間。
  • Web site reports tool to analyze your traffic.網站報告工具來分析您的流量。

Now coming to the comparison with Google Apps,現在來比較谷歌應用,

  • Microsoft Office Live Basics gives you a free domain whereas Google Apps provides domain at 10$ from GoDaddy.微軟Office Live基本給你一個免費的網域,而谷歌應用服務提供的網域10 $從GoDaddy 。
  • Google Apps allows you to create unlimited accounts whereas Office live Basics allows only 25 accounts for free version.谷歌應用服務可以讓你創造無限的帳戶,而辦公室生活基本只允許25個賬戶免費版本。
  • Microsoft Office Live would work well when all users run Windows, have copies of Microsoft Office, and use the latest versions of Internet Explorer whereas Google Apps can run on all OS and browsers (covers most of the popular ones).微軟Office Live將工作時,所有用戶都運行Windows ,都拷貝微軟Office ,並使用最新版本的Internet Explorer ,而谷歌應用可以運行在所有的操作系統和瀏覽器(包括最流行的) 。 I tried to register for Office Live through Firefox and got an error message that Firefox is not supported.我試圖註冊的Office Live通過Firefox和得到一個錯誤信息, Firefox是不支持。
  • Office Live has an excellent user interface when compared to Google’s basic HTML pages. Office Live的有極好的用戶界面相比,谷歌的基本HTML網頁。
  • Office Live is available only for US, UK, France, Japan and Germany users, while Google Apps is available throughout the world (I could not register with Office Live because of this). Office Live是只適用於美國,英國,法國,日本和德國的用戶,谷歌應用服務可在世界各地(我不能註冊的Office Live因為這個) 。
  • A valid credit card is required to complete the sign up process for Office Live.有效的信用卡必須完成註冊過程的Office Live 。 Although they don’t charge any amount for free version, they use it for authentication.雖然他們不收取任何費用免費版,他們使用它進行驗證。 Google Apps does not require any credit card for sign up.谷歌應用服務並不需要任何信用卡申請。
  • The premium version of Google Apps cost around 50$ per user per year, whereas Office live costs you 19.95$ per month and it allows to create 50 users.精裝版的谷歌應用服務的成本約50 $每個用戶每年,而辦公室生活費用$ 19.95您每月它允許創建50個用戶。

I feel if Office Live is available for all locations, then it would definitely give competition to Google Apps as it has good features and design and also the fact that unlimited accounts from Google Apps may not be useful for common users.我覺得如果Office Live是用於所有位置,那麼它肯定會放棄競爭,谷歌應用服務,因為它具有良好的功能和設計,也是事實,無限的帳戶從谷歌應用可能不會有用的,共同的用戶。 The only major worrying fact about Office Live is fact that only Internet Explorer 6 and above is supported.唯一令人擔憂的主要事實Office Live是事實,即只有Internet Explorer 6和以上的支持。

If you like to add any more comparison, please share it in comments.如果你想添加更多的比較,請分享它的意見。

Share this Post分享這個郵報

StumbleUpon公司- 4848.pngDigg的- 4848.pngTechnorati的- 4848.png供稿- 4848.png美味- 4848.png

Comments評論

  • RJ 雷諾 said: 說:

    A good comparision.一個很好的比較。

    Looking at it from my personal perspective; No Firefox support kills Office Live, there and then!看它從我個人的觀點;沒有Firefox支持的Office Live殺死,然後有! and on top of that the credit card being required, buries it finally.和最重要的是信用卡被要求,最終埋葬它。

    If you notice, as an observation, recently a whole load of email spam has been generated pointing to apparently real websites, created on Office Live.如果您發現,作為一個觀察,最近一個整體負荷的垃圾郵件已產生明顯指向真正的網站,上創建的Office Live 。 It’s free, so anyone can go in, enter a credit card (begged, borrowed or stolen) and get a free domain, on Microsoft.它是免費的,因此任何人都可以去,請輸入信用卡(乞求,借用或被盜) ,並獲得免費的網域,在微軟。 All this gives an element of credibility to such spurious websites.所有這一切都讓一個組成部分信譽這種虛假的網站。

  • nirmaltv nirmaltv (Author) said: (作者)說:

    @RJ, @雷諾,
    Well said, Without Firefox support it can’t compete Google Apps.說得好,如果沒有Firefox支持它不能競爭谷歌應用服務。 I never knew about this email spam from Office Live, but your concern is correct, anyone can get a free domain using some credit card.我從來不知道這個垃圾郵件從Office Live的,但您的關注是正確的,任何人都可以得到免費的網域使用某些信用卡。

  • ReviewSaurus ReviewSaurus said: 說:

    Ah!啊! that’sa nice difference.這是一個很好的差異。 I agree that office live will make more impact, if at all they work on few things…the ones you’ve mentioned.我同意,辦公室生活將更多地影響,如果在所有這些工作的幾件事...那些您所提到的。

  • Vaibhav Vaibhav said: 說:

    INterface, the biggest thing to develop pages, If they have so great features then it might be the fist choice for professionals, But google might come with something great by seeing a handsome amount of competition from MS接口,最大的發展網頁,如果他們有如此巨大的功能,那這可能是選擇的拳頭專業,不過谷歌可能會與一些偉大的看到了可觀的競爭從MS

  • Vijay 維杰 said: 說:

    Microsoft have always made it a point to force the use of IE6+ for any user who needs a service from their site.微軟一向點,強制使用的IE6 +的任何用戶誰需要服務,他們的網站上。 That, probably is the only way they are going to boost up their dwindling IE numbers這,也許是唯一的途徑,他們要提高他們的IE瀏覽器數目減少

  • Haris 哈里斯 said: 說:

    I would go for Microsoft Office Live Basics only if it starts supporting all the browsers.我會積極去爭取微軟Office Live基本只有當它開始支持所有的瀏覽器。 Otherwise, Google is the best!否則,谷歌是最好的! :上海:

  • nirmaltv nirmaltv (Author) said: (作者)說:

    @Vaibhav, @ Vaibhav ,
    If you are more interested towards UI design, then Microsoft is better.如果你有興趣的用戶界面設計,然後微軟會更好。

    @Vijay, @維杰,
    Microsoft planning to make IE popular by this way, but this wont be successful unless Office live is that good.微軟計劃使流行的IE瀏覽器的這種方式,但這種習慣是成功的,除非辦公室生活是好的。 Lets wait and see.讓我們拭目以待。 :微笑:

    @Harris, @哈里斯
    Agree with you.同意你的看法。 :微笑:

  • Rishi Rishi said: 說:

    As Mayank said至於說Mayank :想法: , Google is charging on spot but Microsoft is asking for credit card information for incase of emergency! ,谷歌是收費問題位置,但微軟所要求的信用卡資料incase緊急! So what is exactly the emergency?因此,究竟什麼是緊急情況? :扭:

  • nirmaltv nirmaltv (Author) said: (作者)說:

    @Rishi, @ Rishi ,
    The emergency could be attributed to the fact that the free domain could be misused to spam.緊急情況可以歸咎於這樣一個事實,即無域可能被濫用,以垃圾郵件。 In that case they would be able to track the person if he has used a valid credit card.在這種情況下,他們將能夠跟踪的人,如果他使用了一個有效的信用卡。

  • S!ick 這是一種為了滿足!益 said: 說:

    Attempting to sign-up to MOLB was a nightmare: it wouldn’t take my Visa credit card, so I passed on it….試圖註冊多達MOLB是一場惡夢:它不會把我的Visa信用卡,所以我通過它... 。

  • custom tailor thailand 定制慣例泰國 said: 說:

    its really amazing that what i upload in google ,microsoft shows something different其真正驚人的是我上傳在谷歌,微軟顯示不同的東西

  • vicky 維基 said: 說:

    different colors,different text in google and microsoft不同的顏色,不同的文字在谷歌和微軟 :悲哀: http://www.mytailorstore.com

  • Ashish said: Ashish說:

    I really do not understand why we need to have multi-browser support in order to update the site.我真的不明白為什麼我們需要有多種瀏覽器的支持,以更新的網站。 Of course, the multi-browser support is required for the deployed site.當然,多瀏覽器支持所需的部署站點。

    Why can’t we use IE to administer the site created using Office Live.為什麼我們不能使用IE瀏覽器來管理網站的創建使用的Office Live 。 I love office live because the domain is free and they have some good tools for the site too.我熱愛生活,因為辦公室的網域是免費的,而且他們有一些好的工具,該網站了。

  • Open Office and Google Docs 開放式辦公和谷歌文件 said: 說:

    We我們 http://www.fastercats.com have been customizing and deploying Open Office Suite 2.x using Google Docs for much the same thing… without the restrictions imposed by Microsoft’s licensing policy…已定制和部署開放式辦公套件2.x中使用谷歌文件的大部分同樣的事情...而所施加的限制微軟的授權政策...

    Karl A. Krogmann卡爾字母a. Krogmann


Add a comment添加評論

Translate Page網頁翻譯

Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional
中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish
Nirmal is a Software Engineer and Technology Blogger. Nirmal是一個軟件工程師和技術的Blogger 。 He is a Microsoft Most Valuable Professional in Windows Desktop Experience.他是微軟最有價值專家在Windows桌面體驗。
mvp印度技術博客