It depends.
As far as web based clients - Gmail is easier to use than Yahoo Mail and Hotmail.
But still, i prefer my desktop like email clients: at home - Windows Mail and at work - Outlook 2007 - THE BEST.
I agree with Jennifer, I use an email address at my domain name. It supports my branding and marketing. Not sure which of email services you mention is good or not, never used them.
I prefer to use a mail client- particullary Kontact since I can do so much with it. However, I use G-Mail’s POP3 server inside of Kontact so that I can have the same e-mail address easily accessable from webmail. G-Mail’s interface is great for webmail.
I have a different take. I would vote for Yahoo! still I use Gmail as secondary. Somehow, I managed to remove the ads displayed in Yahoo Mail and its looks better than gmail (which has RSS clip ad and sidebar ads.)
I like Gmail a lot.I have it installed on my Outlook express.So I only get normal mails and the spams are not sent.Even we have a seperate thing called Spam in Gmail which is actually increasing in my mail box..I have to delete those..But overall Gmail is the best.
If gmail would allow Conversations (threads) to be turned off, it would be the best IMHO. Unless I am missing some configuration option, I’d have to say Conversations are dangerous: Say you forward a message you receive from A to B with a comment about A’s message you would want to keep private between you and B. And, you also separately reply to A’s message. The threading /conversation feature can cause your private message to B to be seen by A. If there is a solution to this I’d be grateful to hear it!
Gmail簡單地最佳。 以不那麼使它簡單地晃動的ads困惱,完成與獨特的特點。
. 我未嘗試別的
雅虎! 是好,但事是他們顯示華麗的ads一點懊惱
I太其次Shankar的觀點。 Google只顯示我不感到闖入的文本ads,不同於雅虎的橫幅和閃光到處ads。 他們的雅虎郵件beta是太慢的,當與Gmail, atleast比較為我時,并且它無處如高效率
GMail!
提供POP3/SMTP通入
不會投入ads在電子郵件的末端像雅虎
冷卻接口(即使我使用一個電子郵件客戶端)
我認為使用電子郵件從您自己的領域是最佳,但我認為我會連同gmail,如果我需要郵政服務。
當然, Gmail!。 比Gmail有其他郵件好。 Gmail是我的神經中樞。 我通過使用我的Gmail實際做一切。 那也是為什麼我用盡85%我的Gmail存貯
It depends.
As far as web based clients - Gmail is easier to use than Yahoo Mail and Hotmail.
But still, i prefer my desktop like email clients: at home - Windows Mail and at work - Outlook 2007 - THE BEST.
I agree with Jennifer, I use an email address at my domain name. It supports my branding and marketing. Not sure which of email services you mention is good or not, never used them.
For me Gmail is the best
Seems like everyone has voted for Gmail. I too use the mail service from my domain with Windows Live Mail. Occasionally I use Gmail and Yahoo.
I prefer to use a mail client- particullary Kontact since I can do so much with it. However, I use G-Mail’s POP3 server inside of Kontact so that I can have the same e-mail address easily accessable from webmail. G-Mail’s interface is great for webmail.
Gmail Better Gmail FX extension. Wins hands down. No competition.
I have a different take. I would vote for Yahoo! still I use Gmail as secondary. Somehow, I managed to remove the ads displayed in Yahoo Mail and its looks better than gmail (which has RSS clip ad and sidebar ads.)
I voted for gmail. but i use yahoo and gmail both
GMail …. Any doubts ?
I like Gmail a lot.I have it installed on my Outlook express.So I only get normal mails and the spams are not sent.Even we have a seperate thing called Spam in Gmail which is actually increasing in my mail box..I have to delete those..But overall Gmail is the best.
Gmail anyday. Its has the best email organizing i have ever used.
East or west GMail is the best
Gmail is the best…
If gmail would allow Conversations (threads) to be turned off, it would be the best IMHO. Unless I am missing some configuration option, I’d have to say Conversations are dangerous: Say you forward a message you receive from A to B with a comment about A’s message you would want to keep private between you and B. And, you also separately reply to A’s message. The threading /conversation feature can cause your private message to B to be seen by A. If there is a solution to this I’d be grateful to hear it!
Yes, Gmail is the best mailing service available.